PompeiiinPictures
.

I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2010.
Looking north to
entrance doorway from Vicolo del Conciapelle.
Photo courtesy of Drew Baker.
According to CTP,
originally before the 1943 bombing, this entrance had three steps leading up to
it.
See Van der Poel, H. B., 1986. Corpus Topographicum Pompeianum, Part IIIA. Austin: University of
Texas. (p.4)
![I.2.29 Pompeii. September 2005. Entrance. The missing bricks on the left of the doorway, is where the recommendation for Secundum would have been. According to Fiorelli, on this doorway were two electoral recommendations. One in honour of Lucium Ceium Secundum, acclaimed many times in other places:
L. C. S. II . VIR . I . D.
and
POPIDIVM AED . ROG
POLYBIVS
See Pappalardo, U., 2001. La Descrizione di Pompei per Giuseppe Fiorelli (1875). Napoli: Massa Editore. (p.38)
According to Della Corte, this bar was a dependence of the neighbouring house at I.2.28. He could not speculate who it belonged to. He thought it was lived in by a certain Polybius, as proved by the recommendation found to the east (right) of the entrance:
Polybius rog(at) [CIL IV 3379]
See Della Corte, M., 1965. Case ed Abitanti di Pompei. Napoli: Fausto Fiorentino. (p.275)
According to Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby (See www.manfredclauss.de) these read –
Popidium
/
aed(ilem) rog(at)
Polybius [CIL IV 3379]
L(ucium) C(eium) S(ecundum) IIv(irum) i(ure) d(icundo) [CIL IV 3380]](1%2002%2029_files/image002.jpg)
I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2005. Entrance.
The missing bricks on the left of the
doorway,
is where the recommendation for Secundum would have been.
According to Fiorelli, on this doorway were two electoral
recommendations.
One in honour of Lucium Ceium Secundum, acclaimed many
times in other places:
L. C. S. II .
VIR . I . D.
and
POPIDIVM AED . ROG
POLYBIVS
See Pappalardo, U.,
2001. La Descrizione di Pompei per
Giuseppe Fiorelli (1875). Napoli: Massa
Editore. (p.38)
According to Della
Corte, this bar was a dependence of the neighbouring house at I.2.28.
He could not speculate
who it belonged to.
He thought it was
lived in by a certain Polybius, as proved by the recommendation found to the
east (right) of the entrance:
Polybius rog(at) [CIL IV 3379]
See Della Corte, M., 1965.
Case ed Abitanti di Pompei. Napoli: Fausto Fiorentino. (p.275)
According to
Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby (See
www.manfredclauss.de) these read –
Popidium
/
aed(ilem) rog(at)
Polybius
[CIL IV 3379]
L(ucium) C(eium) S(ecundum) IIv(irum)
i(ure) d(icundo)
[CIL IV 3380]

I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2010. West wall. Photo courtesy of Drew Baker.

I.2.29 Pompeii. December
2006. West side with the site of the remains of the counter
and hearth.

I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2010.
Looking north from entrance doorway towards north wall that had a doorway into
the atrium of I.2.28.
Photo courtesy of Drew
Baker
The decorative serving
table, counter or podium would have been on the left and centre of the photo.
According to Garcia y
Garcia, this bar was destroyed completely by a bomb.
The perimeter walls
have been reconstructed, but the three steps to the entrance, the sales counter
and the electoral inscriptions have been lost forever.
See Garcia y Garcia, L., 2006. Danni di guerra a Pompei. Rome: L’Erma di
Bretschneider. (p.37)

I.2.29 Pompeii. December
2006. Looking through site of doorway in north wall, to atrium
of I.2.28.

I.2.29 Pompeii. December
2006. Site of doorway in north wall, leading through to atrium
of I.2.28.

I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2010. East wall. Photo courtesy of Drew Baker.

I.2.29 Pompeii. September
2010.
Looking south from
rear of bar-room, towards Vicolo del Conciapelle.
The unnamed vicolo
between I.1 and I.5 can be seen directly across the roadway.
Photo courtesy of Drew Baker.

I.1 Pompeii. September 2005. Vicolo del Conciapelle, looking west.
(I.2.29 with remains of steps, on right.)